Applying The Standards. Melanie Hammonds. Grand Canyon

Applying the Standards Melanie Hammonds Grand Canyon University: SPE817 December 07, 2016 Applying the Standards Becoming a strong, influential leader is determined by an array of factors, as well as who we are as people. Our most inner being holds the key to whether or not we are destined to become successful leaders. Culture and society also play a powerful role in our leadership style. It is thought that various styles of leadership have varied effects on leadership practice and results. Regardless of our natural abilities, there will always be room for change, growth, and overall becoming a more effective leader. The leadership of the special education director is an essential role in the educational realm. Two of†¦show more content†¦Those are all qualifications and requirements that will never change throughout the years. Comparison of ISLLC and CEC Standards ISLLC standards are organized by knowledge, disposition and performances. The knowledge components are those areas of knowledge that are specific to the standards. The disposition is what the administrator believes in, values, and conveys their commitment to the respective standard. The performances are the processes that the administrator engages and ensures. Both standards address six essential areas to effective leadership, the CEC standards require a knowledge base that is much more specific to that required by special education administrators, while the ISLLC standards appear more generic. The Effectiveness of Leadership Style External factors, internal factors, and relationships all play a huge role in leadership. Society creates a stereotypical idea of what leadership should look like. Berger (2014) considered a conceptual framework that provides three major categories of major approaches to leadership, and how these approaches lead to a better clarification of leadership and its entities. These categories include: achievement, relationships, and values. The achievement category consists of 3 sub-categories (individual, behavioral, and contingent) that all focus on ways in which leaders are defined by their ability to achieve goals. They focus on a particular individual as aShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesGender Role Perceptions? 166 glOBalization! Chinese Time, North American Time 171 Myth or Science? Creative Decision Making Is a Right-Brain Activity 181 Self-Assessment Library Am I A Deliberate Decision Maker? 183 An Ethical Choice Whose Ethical Standards to Follow? 185 Self-Assessment Library How Creative Am I? 190 Point/Counterpoint Checklists Lead to Better Decisions 191 CONTENTS xi Questions for Review 192 Experiential Exercise Biases in Decision Making 193 Ethical Dilemma Do Unethical

Mediation Is An Effective Method Of Dispute Resolution

One of the most peaceful and highly sought after ways of resolving conflict is mediation. It is the process where a mutually acceptable third party, with no authority to make descisions, intervenes and helps involved parties improve their relationships, enhance communication, and use effective problem-solving and negotiation procedures to reach mutually understanding or agreement. Based on the current research found, mediation is an effective method of dispute resolution. In studies prior to 1990, the reported settlement rate was approximately 60 percent and for the 1990- 2000 decade, the reported rate on average was 75 percent . For our most recent decade, this rate is about the same, roughly and 80 percent agreement rate. One of the†¦show more content†¦For example, in the case study we did in lecture, many a times the reasons behind another person’s actions is not solely because of money, but rather by principles and values that were violated by the other party. Hence when one party understands the circumstances and personal reasons certain actions were made by another, movement from entrenched positions become more possible. Lastly, once they are able to air their moral framework, and come to a common solution, the end result would be parties feeling psychologically more complete and satisfied. According to an article by Dr Pinzon Salcedo (2002), that by not having a deeper reflection of one’s true purpose in the mediation process, close to 25% of participants who reach an agreement still express dissatisfaction. On one of the mediation discussions we had, we realised that as the facts behind each party’s anger and resentment were not provided, this always leaves the opposite party feeling confused and frustrated by the behaviour of the aggrieved person. Upon having a sharing of their moral framework privately or openly, the mediation moves from the realm of physical demands, to really addressing the root of the problem behind any hostilities. Therefore, when a successful mediation occurs, both parties are psychologically more at peace with the decisions that are being made. This is large in part due to their own form â€Å"justice† or beliefs are being satisfied as

Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young free essay sample

I recently attended a Crosby, Stills, Nashand Young concert. It was the first time the band has been together fora tour in 25 years, but they havent missed a beat since Woodstock. Thestage was decorated with voodoo dolls and candles that really set thescene for their performance. As soon as the lights dimmed and the bandwalked on stage, the crowd went crazy. One thing that caught myattention were the unique clothes the audience was wearing. Many lookedlike they had been at the original Woodstock. It was trulyamazing how the audience got into the music. The age of the audienceranged from 15 to 60 years old, yet everyone in the packed arena wasreally into the music. People dressed in hippie dresses, ripped jeansand leather jackets danced in their own worlds, while others just noddedto the mellow music. Everyone was particularly pleased with theenergy and guitar playing of Neil Young. David Crosby, Stephen Stillsand Young would jam after every song, totally blowing away the crowd. We will write a custom essay sample on Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Graham Nash gave a stunning performance on the piano and vocals. Theband played for three and half-hours, which included two songs theyhadnt played all tour, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes andHelpless. They performed others like Wood-stock,Ohio, Southern Man and five songs off their newalbum that riled the crowd even more. Overall, it was a greatshow and I enjoyed every minute. It was great seeing these guys backtogether. It was one of the best nights of my life and I recommendanyone who likes the band purchase their new CD, LookingForward.

Second Amendment Final Essay Essays (1288 words) -

Victoria Sanson SOCI 199: Guns in America Professor Mac Innis December 8, 2015 Second Amendment A topic that always comes up when talking about gun control is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". Now people interpret this amendment many ways, whether the right to use and buy guns belongs to individuals or only to a militia. The first phrase people like to decipher is "well-regulated militia". This phrase means a militia that is consistently available and has a reliable quality across the country. For this to be capably people need to be familiar and proficient with weapons. They can't have that level of comfort or availability for defense if they don't have ready access to those weapons by owning them. Militia is another word that causes the most confusion. This word makes people think that the right discussed above isn't held by the people, but only by members of "militia" units; the National Guard. If one is not a member, then they don't have the right to have weapons. Most gun control advocates insist that they do not want to take hunting rifles away and hunting has nothing to do with militia membership. Another phrase people will look at is "to keep and bear arms". This is the right that the people have to possess, carry, train with, and use weapons; if they choose so. They don't just have to keep them locked up in a display case. Lastly the phrase "shall not be infringed" is talked about. No one can take away or limit this right in any way. There is no exception given for "reasonable" restrictions or limitations. There is not a provision for "unless most people think it's OK". There is no distinction between hunting or defense uses. According to the Bill of Rights, these rights shall not be infringed; but some may argue that the Bill of Rights is not considered absolute. The Supreme Court accepted the view that Americans have the right to arm themselves for personal use in their home and applied it to federal, state and local laws. Some courts have permitted the government to limit some rights of gun manufacturers, owners and sellers. Gun control legislation does vary widely among the fifty states. Today, questions about the Second Amendment center on bans on assault weapons, mandatory background checks, and other restrictions on gun sales and use. If so then the Second Amendment could help with the gun crime rate. There are some Pros and Cons of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment can benefit citizens in different ways. As a gun owner they are less prone to crimes. It is a known fact that the probability of being attack by someone decreases when the person that was planning to attack knows that his or her "victim" has any kind of weapon on them. Another benefit is that it helps in preventing the number of crimes to increase. Armed citizens are found to be very helpful in reducing crime incidences. This is because according to John Lott, PhD, gun laws assisted reduce homicides by approximately 8.5%, rape by 5%, and aggravated assaults by 7% as well as robberies by 3%. With the Second Amendment, people get the same right advantage, as criminals. Citizens must have equal benefit and right in securing themselves from people with negative intentions. Gun owners become law-abiding citizens. It is said that people who own and hold concealed firearms can be recognized as law-abiding citizens (APECSEC). The Second Amendment also creates sense of safety and security. A lot of people admit to feeling safer with a gun in their possession, especially when in a crime-prone neighborhood or establishment. Lastly, it gives the right to bear arms. Even with laws that prohibit citizens from owning and carrying guns, criminals have self-imposed right to carry firearms. While criminal carry firearms for malicious intent, citizens can carry firearms for their personal protection. One thing that opponents are worried, however, is that gun-carrying individuals might be prone to commit acts of violence. Based on statistics, however, the general public